With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
April 03, 2003 - 1:23 p.m. In a discussion about affirmative action someone asked why anything has to be done about inequalities in hiring and school admissions. It’s the kind of question I just don’t get. He sees something is wrong but doesn’t think it should be remedied. That goes totally against my grain. In my heart I believe in chivalry, not the reality of the middle ages but the latter day romantic notions of it, the ideals expressed in The Once and Future King. Not “might makes right” but “might for right.” It is not just a right but the duty of those with the power to make things better to do so. It’s true for the individual, for society, and for nations. In Isaac Asimov’s formulated the Three Laws of Robotics.
I’ve always felt that the first and third laws make a pretty good foundation rules of morality on par with the Golden Rule. Asimov pointed out the importance of the inaction clause of the first law. Without it a Robot could drop a safe over someone’s head knowing that he is fully capable of catching it. Then once it was released he could do nothing and let it fall. People need the clause too. How is standing by and letting something that you can prevent happen different from doing it yourself? This makes life more difficult of course. You have to actually make decisions. You have to way the costs and benefits of your actions. Sometimes when you try to help you end up doing more harm. That doesn’t mean you should never help, it means you have to think about what you are doing. You also have to accept that sometimes you’ll be wrong. It happens. When it does all you can do is admit your mistake and try and ameliorate the harm you’ve done.
The International Jewish Banking Conspiracy - October 07, 2008 ![]() ![]()
|